“Don’t Go to Budapest”: Former Russian Spy Warns Putin — But Who's Afraid of His Meeting with Trump?

🔥 When a spy speaks, even presidents should listen.

The West is tense again. And former Russian spies — are suddenly vocal. Not behind closed doors, but in public, by name, with places and advice. This time, it's all about Budapest — the city where Vladimir Putin is reportedly planning to meet Donald Trump. But something's not right…

Andrei Bezrukov, a legendary former undercover agent, made a statement that sounds like a Cold War thriller: "Don't go to Budapest."
Why? Because, according to him, British intelligence might be plotting something unpleasant. Very unpleasant.

🕵️‍♂️ Bezrukov: From sleeper agent to professor

Andrei Bezrukov was part of the infamous spy swap of 2010, alongside Anna Chapman. After being exposed in the U.S., he was traded and returned to Russia, where he became a professor at MGIMO and advisor at Rosneft. And now — he's sending warnings to the Kremlin.

📍 What's wrong with Budapest?

According to Bezrukov, the city isn't safe for a high-level meeting like this one. He claims that British intelligence may be prepared to take bold action if Putin and Trump meet there.

"I have very serious concerns about Budapest. The British mindset is structured in a way that says: if there's no Putin — there's no Russia," Bezrukov stated.

He added that extraordinary actions are not off the table if it serves Western goals.

🧩 Why Britain?

In this geopolitical drama, British intelligence plays the role of shadowy puppet masters. Their alleged goal?
Not just to disrupt talks, but to derail the entire reset between Russia and the potential next U.S. president.

A "sudden incident" during a meeting in Budapest could be enough to shift global alliances. That's the implication here.

🌍 Why Dubai?

Bezrukov offers an alternative: Dubai — neutral, wealthy, discreet, and much harder for Western intel to manipulate.
In times of high-stakes diplomacy, Dubai becomes a fortress of plausible safety.

💬 Warning or psychological maneuver?

Was this a genuine warning? Or a public move to highlight the risks and pressure Western players to back off?

Maybe it's a signal to Moscow: "Don't walk into a trap."
Or perhaps it's part of a deeper game — a move in a larger intelligence operation meant to shape the global stage?

❗️Final Question:

What if this warning isn't paranoia — but a coded signal to powerful players behind the curtain? Who fears a Trump–Putin summit the most?