When Social Support Turns Into a System
🔥 Telegram Slows Down in Russia — and Durov Speaks Out

When apps start lagging, most people blame their Wi-Fi.
But when 15,000+ complaints appear in 24 hours — and Russia's top tech authority confirms it's intentional — the story gets bigger.
Now Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, has broken the silence. And he didn't hold back.
🚧 What's going on?
For the second day in a row, Telegram users across Russia report widespread issues:
Messages fail to send
Media doesn't load
Voice features glitch or freeze
According to Roskomnadzor, this is no accident.
The agency confirmed it's taking "consistent restrictive measures" against Telegram.
Their reasoning? Telegram allegedly:
Fails to comply with Russian data laws
Doesn't protect personal information
Isn't doing enough to combat fraud and extremist use
📢 Durov fires back
In a bold message on his personal Telegram channel, Pavel Durov wrote:
"Citizens are being pushed to switch to a state-controlled app — designed for surveillance and political censorship."
He continued:
"Telegram will stand for freedom of speech and privacy, even under pressure."
And just to make things even clearer, he reminded us of a familiar precedent: Iran, 2017.
The government banned Telegram. The people didn't care. They kept using it — VPNs, mirrors, whatever it took.
His message to Russia? "Same script, new actors."
🧩 Security or control?
Let's be honest: every country wants security.
But what's the line between protection… and control?
Telegram remains one of the last major platforms without top-down moderation.
That makes it dangerous — and very popular.
It's where people talk, share, organize, joke — without asking permission.
And maybe that's the real problem.
🕵️♂️ So who's watching whom?
Is this about user safety?
Or is it about owning the narrative?
Because if people migrate to a "secure, state-backed messenger,"
the question is — who controls the back-end?
And what happens to voices that don't fit the script?
Durov didn't say it directly.
But the subtext is there — and it's loud.
🎯 What now?
Restrictions may grow.
Users will adapt.
And Telegram — either bends or holds the line.
One thing's certain:
This isn't just about tech.
It's a tension point between freedom and authority, privacy and order, platforms and power.
We're not here to pick sides.
We're here to show what's happening.
Because sometimes, a "glitch" is a message in disguise.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Repressions in the Navy? Or a System Reset: What Stands Behind the High-Profile Sentences
A number rarely appears in the news without consequences: 592 million rubles.
When Washington expected to pressure an "isolated" Iran, the regional landscape suddenly shifted. The surprise did not come from a Gulf monarchy, nor from a Western coalition partner — but from the Taliban, a force the United States spent two decades fighting without achieving a decisive outcome.
Who Controls Orbit: States or Musk?
When the switch is in Musk's hands, states fall silent.
The statement came unexpectedly sharp — even for seasoned geopolitical observers. When Nikolai Patrushev warned that Russia could "strike NATO vessels" in response to attempts to block its tankers, Western media paused. Not because the wording was unusual, but because the message signaled a shift from diplomatic pressure to potential maritime...
Putin is "reviewing." Lukashenko already declined. Xi knows the script. And Trump's "World Council" starts with cracks.
Russia's Return to the Caribbean: A Silent Move That Speaks Loudly







