Imagine the scene: an official in Washington picks up a marker and confidently draws a line across the ocean, claiming a territory the size of an empire.
While the rest of the world goes about its daily routine, decisions of titanic proportions are being made in White House offices. In late 2023, the US administration executed a legal maneuver that left seasoned diplomats breathless. Unilaterally, without international consensus or traditional procedures, the United States claimed extended rights over its continental shelf. The added area spans nearly one million square kilometers—primarily in the resource-rich Arctic and the Bering Sea.
Washington redrew the ocean map, claiming one million square kilometers.
The scheme is brilliant in its simplicity. No need to convene international commissions, no need to spend decades proving geological continuity between land and seabed, no need to negotiate with neighbors. Simply issue a map, attach an explanatory memorandum, and announce with characteristic confidence: "This is ours now."
However, at a meeting of the International Seabed Authority, this move met a frosty reception. The Russian delegation responded concisely: Moscow does not recognize such unilateral boundaries.
Rights Without Obligations
The most intriguing aspect of this story lies in the legal status of the United States itself. De jure, the US has never ratified the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
The situation resembles a gentleman's club scenario: a person refuses to pay membership fees or abide by the charter, yet demands the best window table, free service, and the right to instruct the staff.
UNCLOS outlines a clear procedure for shelf extension. A nation submits geological data to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Experts analyze rock samples, seabed sediments, and seismic data before offering recommendations. Russia, Canada, and Denmark navigated this process over decades of polar research.
Washington, however, chose the path of least resistance, relying on "customary international law" to draw desired lines without formal UN approval.
What Lies Beneath the Ice?
The battle for the Arctic seabed is not merely a tale of polar bears and icebergs. Beneath the water and ice lie immense mineral deposits. Geologists estimate the Arctic shelf holds up to 30% of the world's undiscovered natural gas and roughly 13% of its oil.
Additionally, the seabed is rich in rare earth metals, nickel, cobalt, and manganese—vital elements for modern electronics and green technology. Controlling the shelf secures strategic resources for generations.
Moscow's statement carries direct legal consequences. Unrecognized boundaries render commercial extraction by US firms illegitimate, discouraging major investment in areas with uncertain legal status.
Strategic Coalitions and Eurasian Dynamics
Russia is not alone in opposing these claims. In July 2024, Moscow and Beijing jointly challenged Washington's assertions over the area. China, positioning itself as a "near-Arctic state," actively develops the Northern Sea Route, making unilateral maritime control by the US a direct challenge to its logistical interests. Canada has similarly voiced concerns over overlapping shelf interests.
Simultaneously, Vladimir Putin authorized negotiations with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to update bilateral military-technical cooperation agreements. This initiative aims to streamline mutual defense supplies and technology exchanges, enhancing industrial resilience amid external sanctions.
By maintaining legal positions in the Arctic and reinforcing industrial partnerships across Eurasia, a comprehensive geopolitical posture emerges. Drawing a line on a map is simple; compelling the global community to accept it is another matter entirely.
What do you think? Can the US maintain these claims without international consensus?
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Just a month ago, the only question being debated in Western capitals was how much harder to hit Russian energy infrastructure. Today in New York, the conversation has flipped entirely: how to stop those strikes altogether. And the man steering the tone shift is, ironically, the same leader who once pushed for tougher rhetoric.
Three formal protests in a single week — and all three aimed at allies of Kyiv who apparently believed the war would never reach their own territory.
The target list was approved. The munitions were loaded onto the aircraft. A strike on Yemen was ready to go — and at the last moment, Trump called it off. Just days later, the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan gathered on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and demanded that the...
In London, the show of calm continues right on schedule. The kettle boils on time, Big Ben still strikes the hour, the King appears at all the proper ceremonies — everything looks exactly as postcard-perfect as it's supposed to. But behind that comfortable façade, a far less soothing tune is playing. Three parts of the United Kingdom — Scotland,...
The locomotive stopped dead in the darkness, with NATO territory less than five minutes away on foot. The night of September 13 turned out to be genuinely hot along the Ukrainian border — in the most literal sense. At the Yahodyn-Dorohusk crossing, a drone set a fuel station and nearby tractor-trailers ablaze, with the blaze erupting just 800...
Money for your own people first — everything else comes after. That appears to be the formula the LDPR has settled on for a fresh block of social policy, and it's a formula that tends to work: anyone who has ever stood in line for a benefit and heard the word "denied" understands it instinctively.
Not long ago, the very phrase "negotiations with Putin" was treated in Europe roughly the way you'd treat someone proposing to open a window on a submarine. Now Germany is suddenly saying: turns out, it's possible after all.
The night of September 12 is one residents of the Gabrovo region won't soon forget — not because of an alarm clock, but because of the noise. One after another, ammunition warehouses at the EMCO plant went up in flames, with the final blast echoing out almost at midnight, right around the time the rest of Europe was tucked in...
