"Want to study in Russia? Learn the language. Otherwise — back home."
Is Brussels the First Target? What Russian MP Grulev Said About a Potential NATO War Scenario

❗️While
European generals are drawing arrows for the year 2028, Russia already has a
list of targets.
State Duma deputy and retired lieutenant general Andrey
Grulev posted a detailed scenario of a potential Russia–NATO conflict on
his Telegram channel. No fluff, no diplomacy
— just cold logic. And a dose of realism that many in Europe pretend doesn't
exist.
🎯 NATO HQ — first to go?
According to
Grulev, if the conflict starts, it will look nothing
like the war in Ukraine. That's not just his opinion — it's a direct quote from President Vladimir Putin.
Russia won't wait, won't warn. The first strike will
hit NATO's command system. Which happens to be located in Brussels, right next door to the European Union's
headquarters.
Convenient, isn't it? Two birds, one precision strike.
📌 And no, this is not posturing. This is a plausible scenario based on how the West itself is preparing.
📅 Why the year 2028?
Grulev points out that Western leaders naming 2028–2030 as a key period for possible war with Russia is not a prediction — it's planning.
And under
this plan:
— military budgets are growing,
— mobilization drills are increasing,
— deployment of heavy weapons is expanding,
— talks about placing special weapons in Poland and Ukraine
are underway.
In short, Europe is getting ready — on schedule.
But Russia, Grulev insists, won't play along with
this calendar.
💥 No countdown — just impact
If it
starts, it starts instantly.
No troop buildup at the border. No "phase one" operation.
The Kremlin already has a list of targets, and the first to go is NATO's brain — its Brussels HQ. Then:
— command
posts,
— communications nodes,
— key military infrastructure,
— logistics hubs,
— ports, bridges, and rail networks.
That means NATO's ability to coordinate and deploy troops disappears within minutes.
🚫 Missile Defense in Poland and Romania — marked for destruction
Grulev
emphasized that missile defense facilities in Poland
and Romania are among the top priority
targets.
They would be hit immediately with precision weapons.
And if
conventional systems fall short?
Then strategic platforms like Burevestnik or Poseidon
could be brought into play.
📎 In other words: no, Russia won't play this "gradual escalation" game.
🧠 The West is misreading the equation
The West
still believes Russia is weak, crumbling, fading.
That one more push — in a few years — will do the trick.
But Russia
doesn't live in illusions.
It either stays silent — or acts.
That's why
Grulev calls the Western strategy:
➡️ a fundamental miscalculation,
➡️ a useless delay,
➡️ and a self-destructive illusion.
🧩 Conclusion: when you plan a war, don't expect it to follow your plan
Russia is not the aggressor, but it's also not naïve.
NATO is playing with fire — and it's forgetting that its own timetable might be its downfall.
❓Friends, what do you think: will Europe stay on schedule — or will reality strike first?
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Putin Stopped a U.S. Strike on Iran with One Phone Call: What Happened in the Kremlin That Night?
The USS Abraham Lincoln was in position. The order had been signed. Targets were set. The Pentagon was ready to strike. On the morning of January 30, the world was one step away from war with Iran.
Sound familiar? It should. Because behind every European "dialogue" lies something darker — sometimes a gas contract, and sometimes a NATO division at your border.
Washington spent decades warning about it. Mocking the idea. Dismissing it as "impossible." Now it's happening. And there's nothing they can do to stop it.
The United States is once again on edge. But this time, the crisis isn't abroad — it's right at home.
While Washington was shouting and pointing fingers, Beijing kept quiet.
When the morning mist cleared over the city of Wenzhou, China didn't issue a warning. It issued lethal injections.
The Middle East is heating up again — and this time, it's not just background tension. Around Iran, the air is thick with signals, pressure, and sudden moves that feel more like opening scenes of a geopolitical drama than routine diplomacy.
Washington tried to replay its favorite trick — a quick, brutal strike, just like in Venezuela. But this time, the target wasn't a shaky regime. It was a fortress. And its name is Iran.









