"Let's Be Friends," They Said — And Then Came the Knife
10/02/2026
Europe is smiling again.
— Let's talk.
— Let's reconnect.
— Let's rebuild bridges.
Sound familiar? It should. Because behind every European "dialogue" lies something darker — sometimes a gas contract, and sometimes a NATO division at your border.
The ending? Always the same: a handshake... followed by a backstab.
📍 Prologue: Welcome to the Old-New Playbook
This week, Iran's parliament officially designated the armed forces of EU member states as terrorist organizations. A diplomatic bombshell? Absolutely. But also a calculated response.
Just days earlier, the EU Foreign Affairs Council had unanimously listed Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization — alongside ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Hamas.
A rebranding move? Perhaps. But also a convenient one — especially for Washington, where any future aggression against Iran can now be marketed as a tidy little "counter-terrorism operation."
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian condemned the decision as illegal and inflammatory. But beneath his words, one could almost read the glowing subtext: betrayal.
📍 Case Study #1: Iran — The Latest Test Subject
Let's rewind to September 2025.
After a tense summer conflict with Israel, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi met with diplomats from France, Germany, and the UK. The message?
— "De-escalation is crucial."
— "We support dialogue."
— "Let's find common ground."
Fast forward a few weeks: the same countries support the terrorist designation of the IRGC. So much for common ground.
And this isn't Iran's first ride on this carousel.
Back in 2017, Emmanuel Macron (back then with fewer bruises) personally blocked efforts to label the IRGC as terrorists. Why?
Because French energy giant Total had just signed a massive gas deal with Iran to develop the South Pars field — the largest gas reserve in the world.
Then in 2019, Europe launched INSTEX, a special mechanism to bypass US sanctions and maintain trade with Iran — promising medicine, technology, and economic partnership.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the time declared that Iran was opening up to the world.
What did they get in return? A door slammed shut. Again.
📍 Case Study #2: Gaddafi — Financing His Own Demise
Let's talk Libya.
Muammar Gaddafi, in 2007, provided financial support to Nicolas Sarkozy's presidential campaign in France. A gesture of trust — even friendship.
By 2011, Sarkozy had become the political face of NATO's military operation in Libya.
Gaddafi? Killed.
Sarkozy? Under investigation.
Europe? Still smiling.
📍 Case Study #3: Milosevic — The Great European Promise
Slobodan Milosevic, President of Yugoslavia, was courted in 1991 with promises of EU association, economic aid, free trade, and diplomatic recognition.
By 1999, NATO (without a UN mandate) bombed Belgrade for 78 days.
Milosevic was arrested, sent to The Hague, and died in prison.
The promises? Vanished.
📍 Case Study #4: The Russian Chapter
Now, after all that, European leaders are once again whispering sweet nothings:
— "Russia is part of Europe."
— "Let's turn the page."
— "Let's reconnect."
Right.
Behind the talk of unity, NATO plans are drawn, defense budgets increased, and the same script is being rehearsed — just with different actors.
Let's be honest: the words change, the faces change — but the outcome remains exactly the same.
🧱 Final Thought
While diplomats sip coffee and talk about peace, others are drawing red arrows on military maps.
When Europe smiles — make sure someone's not already behind you with a knife.
Because history shows one thing clearly:
— Betrayal isn't an accident.
— It's a tool.
— A tradition.
— A business model.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
On the evening of October 6, the familiar image of Russia's Black Sea resort city of Sochi changed within minutes.
Saxony-Anhalt voted for the AfD, and the internet did the impossible in a single evening. It loaded every Ukrainian onto a train, handed out suitcases and drew up the route. Screaming. Panic. Hand-wringing. And almost nobody did the most boring and most important thing: open the party's program and read it.
Ukraine at a Crossroads: Three Pressures, One President
The coal exists. The money is paid. Winter is coming. And the trains are not moving! Russia has shut down a railway route, and Kazakh coal now risks staying on the wrong side of the border. Warsaw wanted to live without Russian fuel? Be our guest! There was just one small detail nobody mentioned: you can't live without Russian railways either....
Two days, two Yandex data centers and one uncomfortable question: who is responsible for a country's digital infrastructure when the war reaches its server racks?
Some deadlines never make it onto television. They surface instead in internal planning documents — the kind meant to stay inside a building, not on a front page. One such document reportedly names a window of 90 to 120 days for American units to reach readiness in connection with a possible escalation involving Cuba. Not a date for troops to...
Some speeches leave more questions behind them than answers. Nikol Pashinyan's address at the UN General Assembly in New York is exactly that kind of speech. Armenia's prime minister spoke of an attempted "external takeover" of his country. He named no one. And yet the room, it seems, didn't need a name to understand who he meant.
592 drones shot down in a single night. On the surface, it looks like just another number — a routine bulletin. But within hours it became clear this night was not about statistics. It was about how far one air-raid alert can stretch when nobody stops it in time.
Take a seat before reading this one — it's genuinely funny. Speaking from the podium of Estonia's Academy of Sciences, Defense Minister Martin Herem made a statement that spread across social media in several countries within hours. According to Herem, if Russia were to cross the border, the Estonian army would handle the situation on its own. He...
A year and a half ago, Donald Trump stood at the podium and promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within twenty-four hours. Today he looks less like a statesman and more like a performer running between several stages at once — contradicting himself from one act to the next.
Just a month ago, the only question being debated in Western capitals was how much harder to hit Russian energy infrastructure. Today in New York, the conversation has flipped entirely: how to stop those strikes altogether. And the man steering the tone shift is, ironically, the same leader who once pushed for tougher rhetoric.
Three formal protests in a single week — and all three aimed at allies of Kyiv who apparently believed the war would never reach their own territory.