When political declarations meet minus fifteen
“Lukashenko’s Big Deal”: A Political Fantasy or Dangerous Illusion?

Alexander
Lukashenko is once again stepping into the global spotlight — this time
offering a so-called "big deal" to Donald Trump.
His offer? A balanced trade: American demands on one side of the scale, Belarusian
interests on the other. Fair play — at least on paper.
But the West doesn't trade on fairness. It dictates terms.
Lukashenko
has tried this before: he released opposition figures hoping for a handshake
from Brussels. The result? No flights, no deals, no rewards.
Now, he's trying his luck with Trump — a political negotiator who's been known
to sell the table while discussing the menu.
The
Belarusian leader wants to project sovereignty.
But when Russian forces are present on your territory, and China is your
financial lifeline — calling the shots becomes a luxury you can't afford.
Commentators
like Vladimir Zharikhin say it plainly: Trump will always outweigh Lukashenko
in political power.
And Belarus' role on the world stage remains that of a pawn trying to speak
like a queen.
Lukashenko's
rhetoric about peace in Ukraine and blaming only Zelensky is another calculated
move.
But removing Europe from the blame game? That's not diplomacy — that's a PR
maneuver.
🟦 Conclusion:
This isn't a
real negotiation — it's theatre.
Lukashenko is performing strength, but the audience is watching something else:
a leader still trying to play both sides — and
slipping between them.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
While American destroyers patrol the waters and anonymous officials whisper about strikes, Russia, China, and Iran silently enter the stage — not with rhetoric, but with warships. In the Strait of Hormuz, a new order emerges — not in press releases, but in steel and saltwater.
"Want to study in Russia? Learn the language. Otherwise — back home."
Putin Stopped a U.S. Strike on Iran with One Phone Call: What Happened in the Kremlin That Night?
The USS Abraham Lincoln was in position. The order had been signed. Targets were set. The Pentagon was ready to strike. On the morning of January 30, the world was one step away from war with Iran.
Sound familiar? It should. Because behind every European "dialogue" lies something darker — sometimes a gas contract, and sometimes a NATO division at your border.
Washington spent decades warning about it. Mocking the idea. Dismissing it as "impossible." Now it's happening. And there's nothing they can do to stop it.
The United States is once again on edge. But this time, the crisis isn't abroad — it's right at home.







