"Want to study in Russia? Learn the language. Otherwise — back home."
The U.S. Just Filed a Bill to Annex Greenland — No Tanks, Just Paperwork

Washington dropped the bomb — with a smile
While the
world was watching Taiwan, the U.S. Congress quietly received a draft bill
titled:
"The Greenland Acquisition and Statehood Act."
Yes, seriously. Greenland. As a U.S. state.
This isn't a
tweet. Not a prank.
It's an official document published on the House of
Representatives website.
Who's behind this?
The bill
comes from Congressman Randy Fine, who didn't
mince words.
His statement:
"Whoever controls Greenland controls key Arctic shipping lanes and the security architecture that protects the United States."
And the punchline?
"We cannot leave it in the hands of regimes that do not share our values."
Translation from political to real talk:
— The island is important.
— We want it.
— And we'll take it — values or not.
What does the bill say?
📌
The President is authorized to take "any necessary
steps" to acquire Greenland.
📌 Congress is
to prepare a legal roadmap for full
annexation and statehood.
📌 A
comprehensive report must be delivered outlining all legal adaptations needed.
It's clean.
It's neat.
It's a paper-wrapped annexation — with
patriotic ribbon on top.
Trump's ghost is smiling
This didn't come out of nowhere.
Back in
2019, Donald Trump offered to buy Greenland
from Denmark.
When Copenhagen refused — Trump canceled his visit and threatened tariffs.
In 2025, he came back with a warning:
"We will control Greenland one way or another."
Now?
His vision is becoming federal policy.
Greenland: a brief reality check
Let's get the facts straight:
🇩🇰 Greenland is an autonomous territory of
Denmark.
🇺🇸 The
U.S. has operated military bases there since 1951,
under a joint defense agreement.
🏛️ It's not a
NATO member — but Denmark is.
So yes,
America has been "renting the apartment" for
decades.
Now they want to put their name on the deed.
If this bill passes…
It will be the first case of formal annexation of foreign land through internal legislation — no boots, no war, just documents and committees.
Even if the bill stalls, it sends a message:
"If we want it — we'll write a law. Then we'll make it happen."
That's 21st-century imperialism — with legal advisors and a PR department.
Denmark says… nothing (so far)
Copenhagen
is silent.
But in Brussels, analysts are panicking:
— NATO unity
looks shaky.
— The EU is sidelined once again.
— And Denmark may lose its geopolitical wildcard.
Because if Washington makes the rules…
what stops them from claiming anything they want?
Final thought
Today it's
Greenland.
Tomorrow — what?
Cuba? Taiwan? Canada?
If the U.S.
can vote foreign land into its territory,
the world map isn't just changing —
it's being redrawn in Capitol Hill committee rooms.
🧠 What do you think — is this the start of a new global playbook? Or just another Trump-era leftover in a shiny new folder?
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Putin Stopped a U.S. Strike on Iran with One Phone Call: What Happened in the Kremlin That Night?
The USS Abraham Lincoln was in position. The order had been signed. Targets were set. The Pentagon was ready to strike. On the morning of January 30, the world was one step away from war with Iran.
Sound familiar? It should. Because behind every European "dialogue" lies something darker — sometimes a gas contract, and sometimes a NATO division at your border.
Washington spent decades warning about it. Mocking the idea. Dismissing it as "impossible." Now it's happening. And there's nothing they can do to stop it.
The United States is once again on edge. But this time, the crisis isn't abroad — it's right at home.
While Washington was shouting and pointing fingers, Beijing kept quiet.
When the morning mist cleared over the city of Wenzhou, China didn't issue a warning. It issued lethal injections.
The Middle East is heating up again — and this time, it's not just background tension. Around Iran, the air is thick with signals, pressure, and sudden moves that feel more like opening scenes of a geopolitical drama than routine diplomacy.








