"World Peace Council"? Why Russia, China and Belarus Say No to Trump's Show

Putin is "reviewing." Lukashenko already declined. Xi knows the script. And Trump's "World Council" starts with cracks.

The United States is once again trying to play the role of global referee — and, true to tradition, doing it solo. The new initiative, grandly titled the World Peace Council, launched by Donald Trump, was presented as a bold alternative to the UN. But with a twist: leadership wouldn't be collective — it would be personal. Trump himself.

The idea? Gather the most powerful world leaders and solve the planet's toughest challenges — on American terms. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump even declared he wanted "powerful figures like Putin" at the table.

Only one problem: Putin didn't show up. And it looks like he won't.

Russia: "Under consideration" — but no one's going

When asked whether Russia would attend the first meeting of the Council, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov answered carefully:

"The matter is still being worked on. The Foreign Ministry is handling it."

Diplomatic language — but don't be fooled.

Shortly after, Peskov added:

"No one from the Kremlin is planning to attend."

Translation: Russia is giving Washington time to save face — but the answer is no.

Belarus: thanks, but no thanks

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko initially expressed interest. The invite from Washington looked tempting.

But soon, Minsk announced a "fully booked schedule" and "no way to rearrange meetings."

The truth? Belarus made the same decision as Russia. Just in a quieter voice. And with good reason:⚠️ Russian intelligence had just warned of another Western attempt to interfere in Belarusian internal affairs.

No one wants to play with fire twice.

Xi Jinping steps in — quietly, but firmly

The turning point came on February 4: a video call between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.

No media frenzy. No loud declarations. Just understanding. And after that, everything became clear.

Neither Russia nor Belarus will take part in Trump's Council. Not because someone ordered them not to — but because they see the trap.

Trump's plan? Wrap global problems in an American solution and handpick the participants.

But Moscow and Beijing don't follow scripts written in Washington.

Putin's billion — a sharp gesture ignored

Russia even made a move: Putin proposed that $1 billion in frozen Russian assets in the U.S. be allocated to help rebuild Gaza — in the name of the Council's peace mission.

A symbolic offer. A sign of goodwill.

Washington's reaction? Silence. Dismissive. Implying:

"If you want in, bend the knee. A billion's not enough."

That's when it became clear: they don't want cooperation — they want control.

And Putin doesn't play that game.

Lavrov spells it out

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, speaking in the State Duma, made things crystal clear:

— Many countries, both Western and Eastern, including permanent UN Security Council members, are skeptical about Trump's Council;

— Russia demands transparency on how its money would be spent on Gaza;

— Moscow does not accept global structures built on dominance.

Then came the final blow:

📌 Putin has accepted Xi Jinping's invitation to visit China in the first half of the year.

📌 Preparations are underway.

📌 Russia's diplomacy is focused on equal and fair partnerships.

📌 The prime example? Strategic friendship with China.

Council of Peace — or Council of Trump?

Let's ask the obvious: who actually wants this Council?

Sure, it sounds good. But if it's just a second UN — without veto power, without balance, and led by one man in a red tie — then it's not peace. It's a script.

Even America's own allies seem uneasy. Another "world order" ruled by ego and ambition? Not very 2026.

📌 Bottom line:

Russia and Belarus haven't declined — they simply aren't playing.

They're not against peace. They're against political theater.

And China? It's not dictating anything.

It's just there. On equal terms. In sync. And moving forward.