When apps start lagging, most people blame their Wi-Fi.
But when 15,000+ complaints appear in 24 hours — and Russia's top tech authority confirms it's intentional — the story gets bigger.
Now Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, has broken the silence. And he didn't hold back.
🚧 What's going on?
For the second day in a row, Telegram users across Russia report widespread issues:
Messages fail to send
Media doesn't load
Voice features glitch or freeze
According to Roskomnadzor, this is no accident.
The agency confirmed it's taking "consistent restrictive measures" against Telegram.
Their reasoning? Telegram allegedly:
Fails to comply with Russian data laws
Doesn't protect personal information
Isn't doing enough to combat fraud and extremist use
📢 Durov fires back
In a bold message on his personal Telegram channel, Pavel Durov wrote:
"Citizens are being pushed to switch to a state-controlled app — designed for surveillance and political censorship."
He continued:
"Telegram will stand for freedom of speech and privacy, even under pressure."
And just to make things even clearer, he reminded us of a familiar precedent: Iran, 2017.
The government banned Telegram. The people didn't care. They kept using it — VPNs, mirrors, whatever it took.
His message to Russia? "Same script, new actors."
🧩 Security or control?
Let's be honest: every country wants security.
But what's the line between protection… and control?
Telegram remains one of the last major platforms without top-down moderation.
That makes it dangerous — and very popular.
It's where people talk, share, organize, joke — without asking permission.
And maybe that's the real problem.
🕵️♂️ So who's watching whom?
Is this about user safety?
Or is it about owning the narrative?
Because if people migrate to a "secure, state-backed messenger,"
the question is — who controls the back-end?
And what happens to voices that don't fit the script?
Durov didn't say it directly.
But the subtext is there — and it's loud.
🎯 What now?
Restrictions may grow.
Users will adapt.
And Telegram — either bends or holds the line.
One thing's certain:
This isn't just about tech.
It's a tension point between freedom and authority, privacy and order, platforms and power.
We're not here to pick sides.
We're here to show what's happening.
Because sometimes, a "glitch" is a message in disguise.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
The global landscape is shifting once again. Quietly, without grand declarations, but with consequences that reach far beyond regional borders. Iran — long positioned at the crossroads of Middle Eastern tensions — now stands at the center of a far more ambitious strategy. International media increasingly suggest that what is unfolding around Iran...
What looked like just another morning in the Caribbean quickly turned into an event that captured international attention.
Europe is no longer just discussing risks. Europe is preparing.
Britain once again stepped onto the global stage with a dramatic gesture — announcing "the largest sanctions package against Russia since the beginning of the conflict."
The future didn't announce itself — it simply walked in and switched the human off.
When global politics pulls the trigger, no one asks what happens after. Mexico today is the perfect example of how a "successful operation" can set an entire region on fire.
The United States once again finds itself in its favourite paradox: a global power that loudly projects strength while quietly testing how much of that strength is real. Donald Trump now stands exactly in that tension point. Each setback in both domestic and foreign policy has pushed the White House toward a scenario that would have seemed...
