Take a seat before reading this one — it's genuinely funny. Speaking from the podium of Estonia's Academy of Sciences, Defense Minister Martin Herem made a statement that spread across social media in several countries within hours. According to Herem, if Russia were to cross the border, the Estonian army would handle the situation on its own. He...
Delyagin Demands an End to Dual Citizenship with Tajikistan — What’s Behind This?

One letter — and the calm waters of migration policy began to ripple. Russian MP Mikhail Delyagin wants to revoke the long-standing agreement with Tajikistan. But why now?
🇷🇺 It started with a letter
Mikhail Delyagin, a State Duma deputy and deputy chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy, has sent an official request to the Russian government. His demand: terminate the agreement on dual citizenship between Russia and Tajikistan.
The deal was signed in 1995 and ratified in 1996 — back when Tajikistan was reeling from a brutal civil war. Russia stepped in to help ethnic Russians and other cultural compatriots by offering citizenship without the need to give up their Tajik passports. A humanitarian gesture — and a logical one at the time.
Today? Delyagin says the situation is completely different.
⚠️ From humanitarian to harmful?
"The
agreement has outlived its purpose," Delyagin argues.
"Now it's a source of problems, not solutions."
In his statement, the MP claims the treaty now encourages uncontrolled migration, not for work — but for social benefits. According to him, many Tajik citizens:
— Come to
Russia not for jobs, but for citizenship
— Obtain Russian pensions
— Then return home while still benefiting from Russian social services
— Do not integrate, but build parallel communities
This, Delyagin believes, strains the Russian welfare system, destabilizes ethno-religious balances, and even undermines the legitimacy of the Russian state in the eyes of both new and old citizens.
🤔 Why is Tajikistan the exception?
There are no similar dual citizenship agreements between Russia and Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, or Kazakhstan. So why is Tajikistan given this unique treatment?
Delyagin emphasizes the discrimination this creates between post-Soviet states. And in a time when migration tensions are growing — this inequality looks more and more questionable.
🎯 What exactly is he proposing?
Delyagin isn't calling for reform. He's demanding complete termination — denunciation — of the agreement. That would mean:
— No more
automatic dual citizenship
— Stricter rules for existing dual citizens
— A rework of migration flows between the two countries
In essence, Russia would be closing one of its oldest and most symbolic migration corridors.
📉 The consequences?
If the treaty is cancelled, it would mark Russia's most significant shift in post-Soviet migration policy in decades.
The fallout could affect:
— Thousands
of dual citizens
— Families living between two legal systems
— Russia–Tajikistan diplomatic relations
— The labor market and welfare structure within Russia
This isn't just bureaucracy — it's a tectonic move.
🎙️ Why now?
That's the real question. Why is Delyagin raising this issue in 2025?
— Is it part
of a broader strategy to tighten migration laws?
— Is it a personal political play to raise
his profile?
— Or is it a signal from above — a soft probe
to test reactions?
So far, the Kremlin has remained silent. But even silence speaks volumes.
🧩 Final thoughts
One treaty. One paragraph in Russian law. One letter from a Duma deputy.
And yet — it could unravel a delicate balance that has lasted nearly three decades.
Delyagin has spoken. Now we wait to see if Moscow listens.
💬 What do you think?
Should Russia reconsider all its dual citizenship deals with post-Soviet countries? Or would that be playing with fire?
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
A year and a half ago, Donald Trump stood at the podium and promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within twenty-four hours. Today he looks less like a statesman and more like a performer running between several stages at once — contradicting himself from one act to the next.
Just a month ago, the only question being debated in Western capitals was how much harder to hit Russian energy infrastructure. Today in New York, the conversation has flipped entirely: how to stop those strikes altogether. And the man steering the tone shift is, ironically, the same leader who once pushed for tougher rhetoric.
Three formal protests in a single week — and all three aimed at allies of Kyiv who apparently believed the war would never reach their own territory.
The target list was approved. The munitions were loaded onto the aircraft. A strike on Yemen was ready to go — and at the last moment, Trump called it off. Just days later, the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan gathered on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and demanded that the...
The Tea Is Still Hot, But the Cup Has Cracked: Three Parts of Britain Are Preparing to Leave
In London, the show of calm continues right on schedule. The kettle boils on time, Big Ben still strikes the hour, the King appears at all the proper ceremonies — everything looks exactly as postcard-perfect as it's supposed to. But behind that comfortable façade, a far less soothing tune is playing. Three parts of the United Kingdom — Scotland,...
Five Minutes From Warsaw: The Night a Border Stop Gathered Half of Europe's Political Elite
The locomotive stopped dead in the darkness, with NATO territory less than five minutes away on foot. The night of September 13 turned out to be genuinely hot along the Ukrainian border — in the most literal sense. At the Yahodyn-Dorohusk crossing, a drone set a fuel station and nearby tractor-trailers ablaze, with the blaze erupting just 800...
Money for your own people first — everything else comes after. That appears to be the formula the LDPR has settled on for a fresh block of social policy, and it's a formula that tends to work: anyone who has ever stood in line for a benefit and heard the word "denied" understands it instinctively.
Not long ago, the very phrase "negotiations with Putin" was treated in Europe roughly the way you'd treat someone proposing to open a window on a submarine. Now Germany is suddenly saying: turns out, it's possible after all.
The night of September 12 is one residents of the Gabrovo region won't soon forget — not because of an alarm clock, but because of the noise. One after another, ammunition warehouses at the EMCO plant went up in flames, with the final blast echoing out almost at midnight, right around the time the rest of Europe was tucked in...










