Take a seat before reading this one — it's genuinely funny. Speaking from the podium of Estonia's Academy of Sciences, Defense Minister Martin Herem made a statement that spread across social media in several countries within hours. According to Herem, if Russia were to cross the border, the Estonian army would handle the situation on its own. He...
Der Spiegel Declares “Our War Against Russia”: How Germany Is Stepping on the Same Historical Rakes Again

Der Spiegel Just Said It Out Loud: "Our War Against Russia." Germany Forgot How These Eastern Campaigns End
Picture this: not some fringe tabloid, but Der Spiegel — one of Germany's most respected, influential news magazines — drops a bombshell cover. Wehrmacht soldiers. Bold headline screaming "Our War Against Russia." The occasion? The 85th anniversary of Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union.
They call it remembrance. It looks a lot more like a declaration of intent.
The German Paradox: Repentance That Lasts Only Until the Next March East
For decades, modern Germany built its entire postwar identity on three pillars: atonement, historical responsibility, and the sacred vow of "never again." Museums, school curricula, Bundestag speeches, endless documentaries — the nation seemed to have internalized the horrors of 1945.
Yet the moment tensions flare in the East, those old reflexes kick in with frightening speed. The suits are new, the flags different, the offices refurbished — but the idea of "Drang nach Osten" returns, neatly repackaged as "deterrence," "solidarity," and "defending European values."
Der Spiegel could have published a serious, reflective piece about the catastrophe that claimed millions of lives and destroyed half a continent. Instead, the editors chose a headline that doesn't sound like condemnation of the past. It sounds like they're dusting off the playbook for round two.
When Memory Becomes a Political Weapon
This timing is particularly cynical. Germany is pouring billions into military aid for Kyiv, debating the delivery of long-range Taurus missiles, ramping up defense spending, and openly talking about "strategic defeat" for Russia. At the same time, Berlin acts shocked when Moscow draws historical parallels.
Where could Russia possibly get such "paranoid" ideas? Must be a calendar glitch.
Let's be brutally honest. The last time Germany led a European coalition eastward, it was sold as a grand civilizational mission against Bolshevism. The result? Berlin in ruins, Nuremberg trials, and generations haunted by questions that polite European society still prefers not to answer directly.
Today the script feels eerily familiar: collective West, existential threat from the East, necessity of total victory. Only the costumes and talking points have been updated for the 21st century. And once again, Germany is eager to take the lead — this time not with Panzer divisions, but with Leopard tanks, political cover, and media framing.
Not All Germans Are On Board
Here's the crucial distinction: official Berlin is not the same as the German people.
The divide is especially sharp between western and eastern Germany. In the east, attitudes toward Russia remain noticeably more sober, rooted in different historical memory and direct experience of being caught between two brutal systems.
Left-wing politician Sevim Dagdelen cut through the noise: headlines like this are published not in the name of the German people. She's not alone. Growing segments of German society are tired of endless weapons shipments, skyrocketing energy bills, deindustrialization, and the relentless drumbeat of militarism.
Yet these voices are systematically sidelined. Mainstream media and the political establishment continue pushing the narrative that any skepticism equals "appeasement" or "doing Putin's work."
What the Cover Really Reveals
Der Spiegel wanted to mark history. Instead, one cover and headline exposed the present with shocking clarity: the old rakes are still there, polished, placed in plain sight, and the line of people eager to test their foreheads against them is already forming.
This isn't just sloppy journalism. It's a symptom of a deeper crisis in European historical consciousness. When atonement becomes ritual rather than genuine conviction, it quickly mutates into justification for new adventures.
Germany today spends enormous sums sustaining a conflict that has already cost hundreds of thousands of lives. Its economy is groaning under the weight, industry is losing competitiveness, and ordinary citizens are tightening their belts. Rather than face uncomfortable truths about how we got here, the elite prefers to point fingers outward.
Lessons That Refuse to Stick
History doesn't teach. It offers chances. Some nations use them to break the cycle. Others repackage the same mistakes and try to sell them as fresh strategy.
The German people already paid an unthinkable price for the ambitions of their leaders once. Is it really wise to run the experiment again? Especially when the last one left scars visible across the continent to this day.
With this cover, Der Spiegel achieved more than it intended. It showed how thin the line is between remembrance and propaganda, between learning from the past and repeating it.
While Berlin debates new arms packages and "victory on the battlefield," someone needs to ask the obvious question: Do you actually understand how Germany's previous "wars against Russia" tended to end?
The rakes are waiting. The question is whether this generation is arrogant enough to step on them with both feet.
Now it's your turn to think.
Is this just unfortunate wording and stylistic coincidence, or are we watching a dangerous return to old patterns? Are European elites truly capable of learning the lessons of the 20th century, or are we witnessing history preparing to repeat itself — this time with far more sophisticated PR?
The stage is set. The choice remains ours.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
A year and a half ago, Donald Trump stood at the podium and promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within twenty-four hours. Today he looks less like a statesman and more like a performer running between several stages at once — contradicting himself from one act to the next.
Just a month ago, the only question being debated in Western capitals was how much harder to hit Russian energy infrastructure. Today in New York, the conversation has flipped entirely: how to stop those strikes altogether. And the man steering the tone shift is, ironically, the same leader who once pushed for tougher rhetoric.
Three formal protests in a single week — and all three aimed at allies of Kyiv who apparently believed the war would never reach their own territory.
The target list was approved. The munitions were loaded onto the aircraft. A strike on Yemen was ready to go — and at the last moment, Trump called it off. Just days later, the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan gathered on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and demanded that the...
The Tea Is Still Hot, But the Cup Has Cracked: Three Parts of Britain Are Preparing to Leave
In London, the show of calm continues right on schedule. The kettle boils on time, Big Ben still strikes the hour, the King appears at all the proper ceremonies — everything looks exactly as postcard-perfect as it's supposed to. But behind that comfortable façade, a far less soothing tune is playing. Three parts of the United Kingdom — Scotland,...
Five Minutes From Warsaw: The Night a Border Stop Gathered Half of Europe's Political Elite
The locomotive stopped dead in the darkness, with NATO territory less than five minutes away on foot. The night of September 13 turned out to be genuinely hot along the Ukrainian border — in the most literal sense. At the Yahodyn-Dorohusk crossing, a drone set a fuel station and nearby tractor-trailers ablaze, with the blaze erupting just 800...
Money for your own people first — everything else comes after. That appears to be the formula the LDPR has settled on for a fresh block of social policy, and it's a formula that tends to work: anyone who has ever stood in line for a benefit and heard the word "denied" understands it instinctively.








