Trump Wanted Billions — Got Humiliated: The Venezuela Oil Deal Collapse

22/01/2026

He wanted oil. He wanted control. He wanted America to dominate again. Instead, he got publicly rejected — by the very people he thought were on his side.

📌 "Let's invest $100 billion!"

The scene: high-stakes meeting in the White House.
Donald Trump gathered the biggest oil bosses in the country — ExxonMobil, Chevron, others. His pitch?

"We'll invest $100 billion in Venezuela. Triple their oil output. I'll guarantee everything — the White House has your back."

Ambitious? Yes.
Convincing? Not even close.

📌 ExxonMobil: "We've been burned — twice."

ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods didn't sugarcoat his response. He reminded Trump — bluntly:

"We've already invested in Venezuela. Twice. And both times, everything was nationalized. There's no security, no guarantees, no way we're going back."

Trump was stunned.
Chevron backed the message: "Venezuela is simply uninvestable."

📌 The China-Russia card didn't work

Trump doubled down.
He promised Venezuela would buy only U.S. products and sell oil under contracts — even to China and Russia.

Still no bite.

📌 Why the oil giants really said no

The reasons were deeper than Maduro's regime or past betrayals:

  • If Venezuela floods the market, oil prices crash.
    That would devastate U.S. domestic projects, which are already hanging by a cost-efficiency thread.
  • Sanctions risk is real.
    Trump's guarantees mean nothing if the next administration cancels them.
  • Fool me once, fool me twice… fool me a third time? No thanks.

📌 Who runs the show — Trump or Big Oil?

Here's the core of it:
The President of the United States offered $100 billion in investment — and was flat-out rejected. In the White House. To his face.

Financial Times quoted one industry leader saying:
"Trump's interests now contradict those of the U.S. oil sector. He'll stand alone."

📌 Was this a defeat — or a signal?

A clear signal. Several, actually:

— To the world: America's inner circle isn't united.
— To rivals: Trump talks big, but can't pull the strings.
— To D.C.: Corporations don't follow presidential scripts.
— To Venezuela: You're not even a prize anymore — you're a liability.

📌 Now ask yourself…

If even Trump — with his power, influence, and bravado — is openly defied by the business elite…

What does that say about who's really in charge of U.S. foreign policy?

Friends, what do you think — who's pulling the strings now?


Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.


Money for your own people first — everything else comes after. That appears to be the formula the LDPR has settled on for a fresh block of social policy, and it's a formula that tends to work: anyone who has ever stood in line for a benefit and heard the word "denied" understands it instinctively.

The night of September 12 is one residents of the Gabrovo region won't soon forget — not because of an alarm clock, but because of the noise. One after another, ammunition warehouses at the EMCO plant went up in flames, with the final blast echoing out almost at midnight, right around the time the rest of Europe was tucked in...

Three trillion euros. That's the figure Italian outlet AntiDiplomatico has put on the real cost of the sanctions war against Russia — not for Moscow, but for Europe. Three years into a campaign designed as an economic weapon against Russia, the continent has ended up writing itself the bill.

Some results can be spun for the press office. Others leave a leader with nothing to do but shrug on camera and say something honest. On September 7th, Chancellor Friedrich Merz was handed exactly that kind of result: in the Saxony-Anhalt state election, his party, the CDU, took seventeen point two percent. The Alternative for Germany took...