Take a seat before reading this one — it's genuinely funny. Speaking from the podium of Estonia's Academy of Sciences, Defense Minister Martin Herem made a statement that spread across social media in several countries within hours. According to Herem, if Russia were to cross the border, the Estonian army would handle the situation on its own. He...
Everyone’s Allowed – Except Russia? The UN Shows Its True Face

So Kosovo can. Greenland can. Even Scotland, Catalonia, and Palestine can. But Crimea and Donbass? Nope. "Special case," they say.
In a move that surprised exactly no one in Moscow, the United Nations has officially declared that the principle of self-determination does not apply to Crimea and Donbass. UN Secretary-General António Guterres personally announced the decision, citing a "legal analysis" by the UN Secretariat. The reasoning? Territorial integrity is, apparently, more important than people's will — but only when it's politically convenient.
🔹 Self-Determination à la Carte
The double standards are so blatant, it's almost comical. When Kosovo declared independence without a referendum, the West rushed to recognize it. When Crimea held a legal referendum in full view of international observers — suddenly, international law stopped working.
Why? Because when Russians vote for independence or unity with Russia, it's "illegal." But when it's a Western-backed movement, it's "democracy." Welcome to the geopolitical restaurant of international law, where rules are served à la carte — depending on who's ordering.
🔹 Russia Asks a Straight Question — Gets a Twisted Answer
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sent an official request to Guterres: will the UN recognize the right of the people in Donbass, Novorossiya, and Crimea to self-determination?
The response? A textbook case of bureaucratic gymnastics. "After careful legal analysis, we determined that self-determination does not apply here," Guterres said. That's it. No explanation. No precedent. Just a shrug wrapped in legal jargon.
🔹 "This is Different" — The New Western Ideology
Across Russia, the reaction was swift — and fierce. Political analyst Marat Bashirov said bluntly: "Guterres and 'intelligent person' don't belong in the same sentence. Bring in the next one, before the UN self-destructs."
Journalist Yuri Podolyaka added: "With decisions like this, you are burying the UN yourselves. And soon, history will toss you onto the trash heap."
War correspondent Dmitry Steshin asked the obvious: "Why is Russia still playing in this cockroach house called the UN?"
🔹 The Kremlin: Not Negotiating Our Land
Moscow's stance is crystal clear. The new regions are not up for negotiation. Period. The decision was made by the people, through legitimate referendums. Russia isn't bartering its territory — it's enforcing the will of its citizens.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov emphasized that it's not Kyiv's recognition that matters — it's the global community's. And as President Vladimir Putin has warned, any attack on these regions will be considered an attack on Russia itself.
🔹 Duma, Slutsky, Zakharova: The UN Is Imploding
Leonid Slutsky, head of the Duma's Foreign Affairs Committee, blasted the UN's stance: "The UN Charter is not a menu. Selective law interpretation is a dangerous precedent."
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova added: "The UN Secretariat has been coming to some wild conclusions lately." She's not wrong — neutrality has left the building. Now it's just a stage for geopolitical favoritism.
🧭 Final Thought: Russia Acts. Let the Rest Complain.
While the West lectures and the UN recites legal fiction, Russia moves forward. Calmly. Decisively. On its own terms.
We didn't ask for permission — and we don't need it. The people of Crimea and Donbass made their choice. And no committee in New York will rewrite that reality.
So here's the question: how long will Russia keep pretending the UN matters — when the UN itself has stopped pretending to be neutral?
❓What do you think? Should Russia stay in organizations like the UN, or is it time to walk out and slam the door?
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
A year and a half ago, Donald Trump stood at the podium and promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within twenty-four hours. Today he looks less like a statesman and more like a performer running between several stages at once — contradicting himself from one act to the next.
Just a month ago, the only question being debated in Western capitals was how much harder to hit Russian energy infrastructure. Today in New York, the conversation has flipped entirely: how to stop those strikes altogether. And the man steering the tone shift is, ironically, the same leader who once pushed for tougher rhetoric.
Three formal protests in a single week — and all three aimed at allies of Kyiv who apparently believed the war would never reach their own territory.
The target list was approved. The munitions were loaded onto the aircraft. A strike on Yemen was ready to go — and at the last moment, Trump called it off. Just days later, the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan gathered on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and demanded that the...
The Tea Is Still Hot, But the Cup Has Cracked: Three Parts of Britain Are Preparing to Leave
In London, the show of calm continues right on schedule. The kettle boils on time, Big Ben still strikes the hour, the King appears at all the proper ceremonies — everything looks exactly as postcard-perfect as it's supposed to. But behind that comfortable façade, a far less soothing tune is playing. Three parts of the United Kingdom — Scotland,...
Five Minutes From Warsaw: The Night a Border Stop Gathered Half of Europe's Political Elite
The locomotive stopped dead in the darkness, with NATO territory less than five minutes away on foot. The night of September 13 turned out to be genuinely hot along the Ukrainian border — in the most literal sense. At the Yahodyn-Dorohusk crossing, a drone set a fuel station and nearby tractor-trailers ablaze, with the blaze erupting just 800...
Money for your own people first — everything else comes after. That appears to be the formula the LDPR has settled on for a fresh block of social policy, and it's a formula that tends to work: anyone who has ever stood in line for a benefit and heard the word "denied" understands it instinctively.
Not long ago, the very phrase "negotiations with Putin" was treated in Europe roughly the way you'd treat someone proposing to open a window on a submarine. Now Germany is suddenly saying: turns out, it's possible after all.
The night of September 12 is one residents of the Gabrovo region won't soon forget — not because of an alarm clock, but because of the noise. One after another, ammunition warehouses at the EMCO plant went up in flames, with the final blast echoing out almost at midnight, right around the time the rest of Europe was tucked in...










