When a mortgage becomes a fairy tale
For years, Russian families have been promised that mortgage programs would open the door to affordable housing. But when a top lawmaker calls mortgages a yoke and says that developers and banks "will never get enough," it's time to ask — who's really benefiting?
Nina Ostanina, chair of the State Duma Committee on Family, Motherhood, Fatherhood and Children's Issues, didn't hold back during a press conference this week.
"A mortgage is a yoke. No matter how preferential it is, it's still unaffordable for a young family," she said bluntly.
That's not just an opinion — it's a punchline to a failed system.
📉 The numbers don't lie: who's the mortgage really for?
On paper, the Russian mortgage market looks active. From January to September 2025, Russians took out 2.59 trillion rubles in home loans.
But look closer:
🔻
That's 33.5% less than the same period last
year.
🔻 In September
alone: 399.2 billion rubles issued.
🔻 Average loan
size: 5 million rubles.
Now ask yourself — how many young families in the regions, earning maybe 60 to 70 thousand rubles per month, can realistically afford a 5-million-ruble loan?
Short answer: they can't. But the banks? They're just fine.
🏗️ Where does the state money go?
Ostanina didn't mince words. She compared Russia's "Young Family" mortgage program to the classic Russian fable The Fox and the Crane, where the food is there — but no one can eat.
"Stop feeding banks and construction companies. They'll never get enough," she warned.
It's more than frustration. It's a direct accusation — that government money meant to support families is instead fueling profit for the private sector.
🏘️ Back to the USSR?
Ostanina's proposal? A radical shift — go back to the Soviet model.
"I graduated from university — two or three years later, I got social housing. That's how it used to be."
No more 20-year bank chains. Just real, state-owned housing, fairly distributed. An incentive to work, not to borrow.
Sounds unrealistic? Maybe. But in today's reality — where renting is expensive and owning is out of reach — her plan sounds less like nostalgia and more like a challenge to the status quo.
💰 So who wins with mortgages?
Let's be honest. Today's mortgage system isn't built for people — it's built for profit. If you don't have savings, stable income, or wealthy parents, you're trapped.
You're not a beneficiary. You're a revenue stream.
And when a member of parliament openly admits that — maybe the cracks are too big to cover up.
💬 What do you think?
Is it time
to bring back state-owned housing?
Is mortgage debt modern slavery?
Or is this just another political soundbite?
Подписывайтесь на канал, ставьте лайки, комментируйте.
Some deadlines never make it onto television. They surface instead in internal planning documents — the kind meant to stay inside a building, not on a front page. One such document reportedly names a window of 90 to 120 days for American units to reach readiness in connection with a possible escalation involving Cuba. Not a date for troops to...
Some speeches leave more questions behind them than answers. Nikol Pashinyan's address at the UN General Assembly in New York is exactly that kind of speech. Armenia's prime minister spoke of an attempted "external takeover" of his country. He named no one. And yet the room, it seems, didn't need a name to understand who he meant.
592 drones shot down in a single night. On the surface, it looks like just another number — a routine bulletin. But within hours it became clear this night was not about statistics. It was about how far one air-raid alert can stretch when nobody stops it in time.
Take a seat before reading this one — it's genuinely funny. Speaking from the podium of Estonia's Academy of Sciences, Defense Minister Martin Herem made a statement that spread across social media in several countries within hours. According to Herem, if Russia were to cross the border, the Estonian army would handle the situation on its own. He...
A year and a half ago, Donald Trump stood at the podium and promised to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within twenty-four hours. Today he looks less like a statesman and more like a performer running between several stages at once — contradicting himself from one act to the next.
Just a month ago, the only question being debated in Western capitals was how much harder to hit Russian energy infrastructure. Today in New York, the conversation has flipped entirely: how to stop those strikes altogether. And the man steering the tone shift is, ironically, the same leader who once pushed for tougher rhetoric.
Three formal protests in a single week — and all three aimed at allies of Kyiv who apparently believed the war would never reach their own territory.
The target list was approved. The munitions were loaded onto the aircraft. A strike on Yemen was ready to go — and at the last moment, Trump called it off. Just days later, the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan gathered on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and demanded that the...
In London, the show of calm continues right on schedule. The kettle boils on time, Big Ben still strikes the hour, the King appears at all the proper ceremonies — everything looks exactly as postcard-perfect as it's supposed to. But behind that comfortable façade, a far less soothing tune is playing. Three parts of the United Kingdom — Scotland,...
The locomotive stopped dead in the darkness, with NATO territory less than five minutes away on foot. The night of September 13 turned out to be genuinely hot along the Ukrainian border — in the most literal sense. At the Yahodyn-Dorohusk crossing, a drone set a fuel station and nearby tractor-trailers ablaze, with the blaze erupting just 800...
Money for your own people first — everything else comes after. That appears to be the formula the LDPR has settled on for a fresh block of social policy, and it's a formula that tends to work: anyone who has ever stood in line for a benefit and heard the word "denied" understands it instinctively.
